Handover records with Claude: separate findings from decisions

Prepare a handover record with Claude →

An architect accompanies their client on the site of a single-family home extension for what should be the final visit before closing the commission. The contractor announces the work is finished; the client, keen to move in, is tempted to sign without waiting. On site, however, a door handle still needs replacing in the study and a paint touch-up in the hallway has not been done. Should acceptance be refused, granted with reservations, or postponed by a week? And from what date do the client's legal warranties start running?

Handover (réception) is not a end-of-site formality: it is a full legal act, defined by the Civil Code, which produces precise effects — agreement on the state of the works, the starting point of the legal warranties, transfer of custody of the building. A poorly prepared handover, or a decision made without weighing its consequences, can leave the client without recourse for a defect discovered a few weeks later.

This article details exactly what the Civil Code says about handover, the difference between acceptance with and without reservations, the three legal warranties that start that day, and a method for preparing a reliable handover record.

Summary

1. Handover: a legal act pronounced jointly by the parties
2. Acceptance with or without reservations: what each option triggers
3. The three legal warranties that start on the day of handover
4. Preparing a handover record step by step
5. When a handover record is not enough
6. What we observe among independent architects
7. Training to make handovers more reliable
8. Frequently asked questions

Handover: a legal act pronounced jointly by the parties

Handover is the act by which the client declares acceptance of the works, with or without reservations; it is pronounced jointly between the parties, as set out in Article 1792-6 of the French Civil Code. It is neither the end of the site as observed by the contractor, nor the handing over of keys, nor the client moving in: it is an explicit, dated decision that must be traceable in a document signed by the client themself — the architect assists and prepares the ground, but never substitutes for that decision.

Who can pronounce handover, and how

Only the client — not the architect assisting them — has the power to pronounce handover: it is their decision, recorded in a document they sign, possibly alongside their project manager. An architect who has a record signed by default, without the client having explicitly settled their decision, exposes the client to a later dispute over whether real consent was given.

Amicable or judicial handover: two routes to the same effect

Handover normally happens amicably, at the request of the most diligent party — in practice the contractor, who has an interest in having the end of its obligations recorded. When the parties do not agree — a client refusing acceptance without an admissible reason, a contractor disputing the requested reservations — handover can be pronounced judicially, before a court asked to do so. In both cases the act produces the same legal effects; only the route to reach it differs.

Acceptance with or without reservations: what each option triggers

Acceptance without reservations means the client accepts the works as they stand on the day of the visit, with no written reservation: defects apparent on that date and not recorded in the handover document can, in principle, no longer be claimed under the parfait achèvement (making-good) warranty. Acceptance with reservations, by contrast, preserves the client's right to demand that the recorded defects be fixed, without calling the handover itself into question.

What a reservation recorded in the document produces

A properly worded reservation describes a located, checkable defect — not a general impression of the quality of the site. Fictional example: "Door handle in the study (room B12) missing, to be fitted" is a usable reservation; "finishes to review" is not, for lack of location and a checkable description. Reservations worded this way open the parfait achèvement warranty period for the contractor to fix them, with no need to start a further procedure to enforce them.

Tacit handover: a risk to anticipate rather than suffer

A client who takes possession of the premises and starts occupying them, without having formally refused or pronounced handover, may have that occupation interpreted as a tacit handover depending on the circumstances. That risk grows the longer time passes between the apparent end of the works and the absence of any formalized decision: one more reason never to leave the handover question "open" beyond a few weeks after the announced end of the site.

The three legal warranties that start on the day of handover

The handover date recorded in the document is not merely an administrative formality: it is the common starting point of the three legal warranties protecting the client after the works are delivered. A date error in the record shifts, by the same amount, the periods the client has to act.

Why the date on the record matters more than the actual end-of-site date

These three periods do not start from the actual end of the works, nor from the date of the last invoice, but from the handover date itself, as it appears in the signed record — that is the practical effect of Article 1792-6 for the parfait achèvement warranty, and the same principle governs the biennale and décennale warranties set out in Articles 1792-3 and 1792 of the same code. A back-dated or post-dated record, even by a few days, genuinely changes the periods available to the client — a point the architect must verify before signature, never reconstruct from memory afterwards.

Preparing a handover record step by step

Preparing a reliable handover record follows a precise order, which separates what belongs to the findings from what belongs to the decision — the two must never be blurred in the final document.

Step 1: Gather the parties present and their status. Client, project manager, contractors involved: each participant must be identified with their exact status, so the record proves who was present and who signed.

Step 2: Organize the visit by trade, room or zone. A visit structured by technical trade or by room limits the risk of missing a defect located in a rarely visited zone, and makes it easier later to reconcile the record with the defect-tracking register.

Step 3: Word each reservation with a location and a checkable description. A reservation must be findable on site by someone who did not attend the visit — without a precise location, it loses much of its evidential value.

Step 4: Have the client explicitly confirm the decision and its date. The decision to accept, with or without reservations, or to postpone handover, belongs to the client: it is never inferred from the visit alone, and must be obtained before the document is closed.

Step 5: Have the record signed and circulated to every party involved. An unsigned record, or one signed by only one party, loses much of its evidential force in the event of a later disagreement over its content.

When a handover record is not enough

A properly drafted record does not cover every situation encountered on a site.

A disagreement over the very principle of handover — the client considering the works unfinished, the contractor considering them compliant — is not resolved with a better-worded record: it calls for either a negotiated agreement between the parties or, failing that, judicial handover, a route beyond what a document template alone can prepare. A site involving several clients — a co-ownership body, a self-build collective — often requires organizing the visit and signature in a way suited to several decision-makers, best checked with a legal professional before the visit. Finally, a tacit handover already in effect — a client occupying the premises for months with no signed document — is not fixed simply by drafting a record after the fact: the situation must be analyzed before any further step, to avoid creating a contradiction between an actual occupation date and a handover date artificially fixed later. A record prepared with AI assistance remains, in every case, a draft: it must be reviewed and approved by the client before signature, and by a legal professional as soon as the situation departs from a standard case.

What we observe among independent architects

In our exchanges with independent architects about their site handovers, the sticking point is almost never understanding the legal framework itself: an architect knows a reservation must be precise and a decision must be recorded. What costs time is formatting the record after a sometimes long visit — retrieving the template used last time, cleanly rewording notes taken on the spot, or checking that no reservation was lost between the site notebook and the final document. That is formatting work, not a lack of rigor — and it is exactly the kind of task a well-structured document template removes, without taking away any of the client's decision on handover itself, which can only ever be theirs.

Training to make handovers more reliable

Setting up a handover-record template once and for all is not enough: it also needs adapting to every site without losing time or missing a reservation. For an architect practising as a self-employed professional (NAF code 7111Z in France), the FIFPL fund covers part of the cost of Qualiopi-certified training under 2026 criteria set at €300 per day and €900 per year, with e-learning capped at 50% of the daily rate. This funding must be arranged before training starts, not after.

Frequently asked questions

Who has the power to decide on handover, the architect or the client?

Only the client has the power to pronounce handover: it is a decision that belongs to them alone, not a formality the architect could settle on their behalf. The architect assists the client during the visit, helps word the reservations and prepares the document, but the client's signature must always reflect a decision they explicitly made, with or without reservations, never a signature of convenience applied just to close the visit. A record signed without that decision having been clearly obtained exposes the client to a later dispute over whether real consent was given, particularly if a defect not recorded as a reservation is discovered afterwards.

What happens if the client occupies the home without having signed a handover record?

That occupation may be interpreted by the courts as a tacit handover depending on the circumstances of the case, which would start the warranty periods running from a date the parties never formally settled. It is a risk, not an automatic certainty: it depends on the length of occupation, the context, and whether a dispute has been raised through some other channel. Good practice remains to avoid this situation by formalizing the decision, with or without reservations, before or at the time the keys are handed over.

Does a reservation not fixed after one year remain enforceable?

The parfait achèvement warranty, set out in Article 1792-6 of the Civil Code, requires the contractor to fix reserved defects within one year of handover; a reservation not fixed within that period does not automatically disappear, but enforcing it after the period expires becomes more complex and depends on a case-by-case analysis, often with the help of a legal professional. That is one more reason to actively track every reservation through to its actual resolution, rather than waiting until the deadline to check what is still open. That is exactly what a defect-tracking register is for: recording, reservation by reservation, its description, its location and its actual resolution date, so no deadline approaches without visibility into what remains outstanding.

Do all three warranties start on the same date?

Yes: the three periods — one, two and ten years — all run from the same date, the handover date recorded in the document, not the actual end-of-works date or the date of the last invoice. That is precisely what makes the date on the record so important: an error or imprecision on this point shifts all three periods by the same amount, including the décennale warranty, which protects the client for the longest period. An incorrect date should therefore be corrected before the record is signed, never regularized afterwards through a corrective document whose evidential value would remain fragile in the event of a dispute.

Does acceptance with reservations protect the client less well than acceptance without?

No, the opposite is true: acceptance with reservations explicitly preserves the client's right to demand that recorded defects be fixed, without calling the overall acceptance of the works into question. Acceptance without reservations, conversely, in principle closes off the ability to claim under the parfait achèvement warranty for a defect apparent on the day of the visit and not recorded in the document — which is why one should never give in to schedule pressure and accept handover without reservations when defects are still visible on site. A client still torn, at the time of the visit, between accepting with reservations and postponing handover is therefore better off choosing the former as soon as the defects are minor and clearly identifiable, rather than delaying a decision nothing requires them to put off.

A reliable site handover rests on three elements that do not change from one project to the next: a decision explicitly made by the client and not inferred from the visit alone, located and checkable reservations where there are any, and an accurate handover date, since it fixes the starting point of the three legal warranties. Once that foundation is in place, it is exactly what the handover-record generator applies automatically, while leaving the client the decision that belongs to them alone.

Before handover, our method for the deposit invoice revisits the commission's first accounting document, and after the visit, our defect-tracking register guide details how to trace every reservation through to its resolution.

Training 100% fundable via OPCO/FIFPL. Qualiopi-certified programme. To structure your site handovers and contractual documents with AI as part of our AI for architectural management training, contact Educasium and specify your status (employee, self-employed, business owner) and your goal.